3
06
nasal prongs among other measures. The patient also did
well on CPAP even on a low PEEP of 5cmH O. Occa-
Conclusion
2
sionally some babies may require higher PEEP and yet
are not able to maintain saturation suggesting the re-
quirement of more respiratory support in form of me-
chanical ventilation.
The successful use of nasal bubble CPAP, a simple and
inexpensive respiratory support in the management of
this case of idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome in
our unit promises an improved care to newborns who
may require respiratory support particularly in our poor
socio economic setting where there is paucity of neona-
tal intensive care units with ventilator support and inade-
quate skilled manpower to provide such care. We
The provision of optimal newborn care and adequate
management of hypothermia, an important contributor
to neonatal morbidity and mortality which aggravates
IRDS, would have contributed the outcome in this pa-
tient. Similarly the use of antibiotics and provision of
optimal fluid and electrolytes are important. While anti-
biotics were employed as possible treatment for group B
streptococcal pneumonia, an important differential diag-
nosis which may be clinically and radiographically in-
distinguishable from IRDS, the optimal fluid and elec-
trolytes management provided adequate caloric require-
ments and prevented fluid overload, all of which are
essential determinants of outcome in newborn care.
recommend therefore, that neonatal care providers be
trained and acquainted with the use of bubble CPAP to
improve newborn care in the country.
Conflict of interest: None
Funding: None
References
1
2
3
.
.
.
Medha W. Non invasive respira-
tory support in the neonate: Con-
tinuous positive airway pressure
8. Bahareh BB, Arash M, Pedram N,
Mohammad RB. Bubble–CPAP
vs. Ventilatory–CPAP in Preterm
Infants with Respiratory Distress.
Iran J Pediatr 2011; 21 (2):151-
82),
9. Roehr CC, Schmalisch G, Khak-
ban A, Proquitté H, Wauer R.R.
Use of continuous positive airway
pressure (CPAP) in neonatal units
– A survey of current preferences
and practice in Germany Eur J
Med Res 2007; 12: 139 – 44
10. Roberts CL, Badgery-Parker T,
Algert CS, Bowen JR, Nassar N.
Trends in use of neonatal CPAP: A
population-based study. BMC Pe-
diatrics 2011, 11:89
11. Vidyasagar D, Velaphi S, Bhat
VB. Surfactant Replacement Ther-
apy in Developing Countries. Neo-
natology 2011; 99: 355 – 66
1
1
4. Torrance HL, Derks JB, Scherjon
SA, Wijnberger LD, Visser GH. Is
antenatal steroid treatment effec-
tive in preterm IUGR fetuses? Acta
Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; 88
(CPAP). Sri Lanka Journal of
Child Health 2011; 40:172- 6
Neil NF, Waldemar AC, Michele
CW, Wade R, Marie GG et al.
Early CPAP versus Surfactant in
Extremely Preterm Infants. N Engl
J Med 2010; 362 (21):1970- 9
Prashanth SU, Firdose K, Maiya
PP. Bubble CPAP - A Primary
Respiratory Support for Respira-
tory Distress Syndrome in New-
borns. Indian Pediatr 2009; 46:
(10):1068-73.
5. Morrison JL, Botting KJ, Soo
PS, McGillick EV, Hiscock
J, Zhang S, McMillen IC, Orgeig
S. Antenatal Steroids and the
IUGR Fetus: Are Exposure and
Physiological Effects on the Lung
and Cardiovascular System the
Same as in Normally Grown Fe-
tuses? J Pregnancy 2012 Published
online 2012 November
4
09 – 11.
4
5
6
.
.
.
Chan KM, Chan HB. The Use of
Bubble CPAP in Premature In-
fants: Local Experience. HK J
Paediatr 2007; 12:86-92.
Mathai SS, Raju U, Kanitkar M.
Management of Respiratory Dis-
tress in the Newborn. MJAFI 2007;
2
2. doi: 10.1155/2012/839656
Epub 2012 Nov 22.
1
1
6. Abbasalizadeh SH, Abbasalizadeh
F, sharifan Z. Pulmonary Matura-
tion in Preterm Rupture of Mem-
branes with Oligohydramnious J
Med Sci 2007 7: 203- 9.
7. Colin JM, Peter GD, Lex WD, Luc
PB, Jean-Michel H, John BC. Na-
sal CPAP or Intubation at Birth for
Very Preterm Infants N Engl J Med
2008; 358:700 - 8
12. Narang A, Chaudhuri MK, Kumar
P. Small for gestational age babies:
Indian scene. Indian J Pediatr
1997; 64(2): 221-4.
6
3( 3) : 269 – 72.
Nowadzky T, Pantoja A, Britton
JR. Bubble Continuous Positive
Airway Pressure, A potentially
better practice reduces the use of
mechanical ventilation among very
low birth weight infants with respi-
ratory distress syndrome. Pediat-
rics 2009;123(6):1534-40
1
3. Regev RH, Reidman B. Prematur-
ity and intrauterine growth retarda-
tion – double jeopardy. Clin Peri-
natol 2004; 31: 453 – 73
7
.
Avery ME, Tooley WH, Keller JB,
et al. Is chronic lung disease in low
birth weight infants preventable? A
survey of eight centers. Pediatrics
1
987; 79:26-30.